Journal of Early Intervention

865 papers and 18.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 865 papers published in Journal of Early Intervention in the last decades have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Early Intervention usually cover Clinical Psychology (566 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (382 papers) and Education (288 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (510 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (191 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (170 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Early Intervention are Michael J. Guralnick, Samuel L. Odom, Ann P. Kaiser, Diane Bricker, Donald B. Bailey, Mary Louise Hemmeter, Hoi K. Suen, Mark Wolery, Howard Goldstein and Steven F. Warren.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Early Intervention

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Early Intervention. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Early Intervention.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Early Intervention

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Early Intervention. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Early Intervention with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Early Intervention more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025