Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

767 papers and 14.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 767 papers published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science usually cover Social Psychology (449 papers), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (202 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (134 papers) specifically the topics of Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (321 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (202 papers) and Ergonomics and Human Factors (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science are Christopher D. Wickens, Neville A. Stanton, Paul M. Salmon, David Kaber, Raja Parasuraman, Mica R. Endsley, Mark S. Young, Guy H. Walker, Douglas A. Wiegmann and François Daniellou.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025