Countries where authors publish in Journal of the History of Ideas
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the History of Ideas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the History of Ideas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the History of Ideas more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of the History of Ideas
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the History of Ideas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the History of Ideas.
About Journal of the History of Ideas
The 2.6k papers published in Journal of the History of Ideas in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the History of Ideas usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (457 papers), Philosophy (667 papers) and History (494 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Philosophy and Science (233 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (231 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (182 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (176 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (174 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (133 papers), Political Theory and Influence (113 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the History of Ideas are Philip P. Wiener, Paul Edwards, Thomas R. Bates, Paul Oskar Kristeller, Ann Blair, Ernst Mayr, Charles Withers, Michaela Richter, Peter Harrison and Donald R. Kelley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.