German Studies Review

3.5k papers and 23.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in German Studies Review in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations. Papers published in German Studies Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers) and History (930 papers) specifically the topics of European history and politics (1.0k papers), German History and Society (628 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (552 papers). The most active scholars publishing in German Studies Review are Henry Friedlander, Geoffrey J. Giles, Gavriel D. Rosenfeld, Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, James E. Young, Marilyn Shevin Coetzee, Lutz R. Reuter, Ann Taylor Allen, David Lindenfeld and Georg G. Iggers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in German Studies Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in German Studies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in German Studies Review.

Countries where authors publish in German Studies Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in German Studies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in German Studies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites German Studies Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025