Journal of General Music Education

521 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 521 papers published in Journal of General Music Education in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of General Music Education usually cover Music (353 papers), Education (182 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (106 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Music Education Insights (337 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (90 papers) and Art Education and Development (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of General Music Education are Alice-Ann Darrow, Sheila Scott, Carlos R. Abril, Lori A. Custodero, Penny A. Freppon, Robert A. Cutietta, Patricia Riley, Lori F. Gooding, Christopher Cayari and Francine Morin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of General Music Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of General Music Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of General Music Education.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of General Music Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of General Music Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of General Music Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of General Music Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025