Journal of Employment Counseling

962 papers and 8.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 962 papers published in Journal of Employment Counseling in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Employment Counseling usually cover Social Psychology (276 papers), Safety Research (240 papers) and Education (232 papers) specifically the topics of Career Development and Diversity (199 papers), Higher Education and Employability (143 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Employment Counseling are Norman E. Amundson, Stephen B. Knouse, Annamaria Di Fabio, C. H. Patterson, William A. Borgen, Mark J. Miller, Nancy K. Schlossberg, Zhou Jiang, Mark L. Savickas and Robert Pryor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Employment Counseling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Employment Counseling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Employment Counseling.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Employment Counseling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Employment Counseling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Employment Counseling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Employment Counseling more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025