Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Model for Analyzing Human Adaptation to Transition
1981674 citationsNancy K. SchlossbergThe Counseling Psychologistprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy K. Schlossberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy K. Schlossberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy K. Schlossberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy K. Schlossberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy K. Schlossberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy K. Schlossberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy K. Schlossberg. The network helps show where Nancy K. Schlossberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy K. Schlossberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy K. Schlossberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy K. Schlossberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy K. Schlossberg. Nancy K. Schlossberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schlossberg, Nancy K.. (2009). Revitalizing Retirement: Reshaping Your Identity, Relationships, and Purpose.14 indexed citations
3.
Goodman, Jane, Nancy K. Schlossberg, & Mary L. Anderson. (2006). Counseling adults in transition: Linking practice with theory, 3rd ed..112 indexed citations
4.
Fabian, Ellen S., et al.. (1996). Grandparents Raising Grandchildren. Journal of Counseling & Development. 74(6). 548–554.146 indexed citations
5.
Schlossberg, Nancy K.. (1990). Training Counselors to Work with Older Adults.. 14(1). 7–10.19 indexed citations
6.
Schlossberg, Nancy K.. (1989). Overwhelmed: Coping with Life's Ups and Downs. Medical Entomology and Zoology.71 indexed citations
7.
Schlossberg, Nancy K., et al.. (1988). Managing adult transitions. Training and development journal. 42(12). 58–61.38 indexed citations
Schlossberg, Nancy K.. (1987). UNDERSTANDING AND REACHING ADULT LEARNERS. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill. 22(1).2 indexed citations
10.
Leibowitz, Zandy B. & Nancy K. Schlossberg. (1982). Critical Career Transitions: A Model for Designing Career Services.. Training and development journal. 36(2).7 indexed citations
11.
Leibowitz, Zandy B. & Nancy K. Schlossberg. (1981). Training Managers for Their Role in a Career Development System.. Training and development journal. 35(7). 72–79.30 indexed citations
12.
Schlossberg, Nancy K.. (1981). Reactions to Reactions. The Counseling Psychologist. 9(2). 49–50.1 indexed citations
13.
Schlossberg, Nancy K.. (1978). Five Propositions about Adult Development.. Journal of College Student Personnel. 19(5).3 indexed citations
Schlossberg, Nancy K., et al.. (1963). [Disorders of communication and counter-transference neurosis].. PubMed. 20. 63–9.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.