Information Systems Research

1.5k papers and 166.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Information Systems Research in the last decades have received a total of 166.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Systems Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (499 papers), Strategy and Management (393 papers) and Marketing (361 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Platforms and Economics (291 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (272 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (245 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Systems Research are Viswanath Venkatesh, Izak Benbasat, Peter Todd, Wanda J. Orlikowski, William DeLone, Ephraim R. McLean, Ritu Agarwal, Gary C. Moore, Shirley Taylor and Kieran Mathieson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Systems Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Systems Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Systems Research.

Countries where authors publish in Information Systems Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Systems Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Systems Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Systems Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025