Monthly Weather Review

11.5k papers and 540.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.5k papers published in Monthly Weather Review in the last decades have received a total of 540.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Monthly Weather Review usually cover Atmospheric Science (9.6k papers), Global and Planetary Change (8.0k papers) and Oceanography (2.8k papers) specifically the topics of Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7.6k papers), Climate variability and models (6.8k papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Monthly Weather Review are Joseph Smagorinsky, Jimy Dudhia, Thomas M. Hamill, M. Tiedtke, Zavisă Janjić, John M. Wallace, Song-You Hong, J. G. Anderson, William M. Gray and J. Bjerknes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Monthly Weather Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Monthly Weather Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Monthly Weather Review.

Countries where authors publish in Monthly Weather Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Monthly Weather Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Monthly Weather Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monthly Weather Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025