Countries where authors publish in History and Memory
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History and Memory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History and Memory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History and Memory more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in History and Memory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History and Memory.
About History and Memory
The 349 papers published in History and Memory in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Papers published in History and Memory usually cover History (111 papers), Space and Planetary Science (8 papers) and Social Psychology (122 papers) specifically the topics of Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (119 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (38 papers), European history and politics (35 papers), German History and Society (35 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (33 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (30 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (22 papers) and Balkans: History, Politics, Society (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History and Memory are Froma I. Zeitlin, Elie Podeh, Mark Edele, Yinan He, Allen, Gil Eyal, Jérôme Bourdon, Feldman, Alon Confino and Philippe Burrin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.