Countries where authors publish in Woman s Art Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Woman s Art Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Woman s Art Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Woman s Art Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Woman s Art Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Woman s Art Journal.
About Woman s Art Journal
The 567 papers published in Woman s Art Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Woman s Art Journal usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (120 papers), Museology (69 papers) and History (78 papers) specifically the topics of Art, Politics, and Modernism (87 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (57 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (39 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (24 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (23 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (21 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (20 papers) and Architecture, Design, and Social History (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Woman s Art Journal are Ella Shohat, Patricia Mathews, Rozsika Parker, Marina Warner, Rosemary Betterton, Ruth P. Rubinstein, Amelia Jones, Valerie Steele, Janet A. Kaplan and Hilary Robinson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.