National Identities

582 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 582 papers published in National Identities in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in National Identities usually cover Sociology and Political Science (361 papers), Political Science and International Relations (230 papers) and History (78 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Refugees, and Integration (51 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (48 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in National Identities are Marco Antonsich, James Dingley, Alan Bairner, Karina V. Korostelina, Andrew Mycock, David Storey, F. Lancaster Jones, Wolfram Kaiser, Sami Moisio and Brett Bowden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in National Identities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in National Identities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in National Identities.

Countries where authors publish in National Identities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in National Identities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in National Identities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Identities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025