Countries where authors publish in Cultural Dynamics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cultural Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cultural Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural Dynamics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cultural Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cultural Dynamics.
About Cultural Dynamics
The 526 papers published in Cultural Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Cultural Dynamics usually cover Anthropology (84 papers), Cultural Studies (67 papers), Sociology and Political Science (272 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (26 papers) and Gender Studies (42 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (53 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (25 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (23 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (20 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (20 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (18 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (18 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cultural Dynamics are Lamia Karim, Tim Ingold, Laura Nader, Margit van Wessel, Jay L. Lemke, Nadine Naber, Sandya Hewamanne, Gilberto Rosas, Carolyn E. Taylor and Ruth C. Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.