Countries where authors publish in College literature
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in College literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in College literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College literature more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in College literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in College literature.
About College literature
The 590 papers published in College literature in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations . Papers published in College literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (297 papers), Music (35 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (53 papers) specifically the topics of Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (53 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (49 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (37 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (36 papers), Race, History, and American Society (34 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (32 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (25 papers) and Irish and British Studies (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in College literature are Henry A. Giroux, Steven Salaita, Patchen Markell, Jeffrey J. Williams, Michael A. Chaney, John Rodden, Robyn Warhol, Sophia A. McClennen, James E. Dobson and Mihoko Suzuki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.