Countries where authors publish in Postmodern Culture
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Postmodern Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Postmodern Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Postmodern Culture more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Postmodern Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Postmodern Culture.
About Postmodern Culture
The 511 papers published in Postmodern Culture in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Postmodern Culture usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (127 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (54 papers), Music (30 papers), Philosophy (95 papers) and Cultural Studies (66 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (51 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (43 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (35 papers), Digital Games and Media (34 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (29 papers), Music History and Culture (23 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (19 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Postmodern Culture are bell hooks, Andrew Ross, Marie‐Laure Ryan, Stuart Moulthrop, Christopher Douglas, N. Katherine Hayles, Meyda Yeğenoğlu, Jonathan Beller, Ben Roberts and Cathy Caruth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.