Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre
This map shows the geographic impact of Darko Suvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Darko Suvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Darko Suvin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Darko Suvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Darko Suvin. The network helps show where Darko Suvin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Darko Suvin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Darko Suvin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Darko Suvin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Darko Suvin. Darko Suvin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Suvin, Darko. (2015). Fifteen theses about communism and Yugoslavia, or the two-headed Janus of emancipation through the State: (Metamorphoses and anamorphoses of ‘On the Jewish Question’ by Marx). Critical Quarterly. 57(2). 90–110.3 indexed citations
4.
Suvin, Darko. (2015). Um breve tratado sobre a Distopia 2001. 10. 465–488.1 indexed citations
Suvin, Darko. (2011). "Utopian" and "Scientific": Two Attributes for Socialism from Engels. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).1 indexed citations
7.
Suvin, Darko. (2011). Bureaucracy: a Term and Concept in the Socialist Discourse about State Power (Before 1941). University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 48(5). 193–214.4 indexed citations
Suvin, Darko. (1998). Utopianism from Orientation to Agency: What Are We Intellectuals under Post-Fordism to Do?(1). Utopian Studies. 9(2). 162.7 indexed citations
Suvin, Darko. (1991). The Soul and the Sense: Meditations on Roland Barthes on Japan (à propos of L'Empire des signes). Canadian review of comparative literature. 18(4). 499–531.2 indexed citations
14.
Suvin, Darko. (1982). Transubstantiation of Production and Creation: Metamorphic Imagery in the Grundrisse. Minnesota Review. 18(1). 102–115.1 indexed citations
Suvin, Darko. (1979). Poetik der Science Fiction : zur Theorie und Geschichte einer literarischen Gattung. Suhrkamp eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Suvin, Darko. (1977). Pour une poétique de la science-fiction : études en théorie et en histoire d'un genre littéraire. Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Suvin, Darko, et al.. (1977). H.G. Wells and modern science fiction.4 indexed citations
19.
Suvin, Darko. (1975). Wells as the Turning Point of the SF Tradition. Minnesota Review. 4(1). 106–115.3 indexed citations
20.
Suvin, Darko. (1970). Reflections on Happenings. The Drama Review TDR. 14(3). 125–144.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.