Curriculum Perspectives

346 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 346 papers published in Curriculum Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Curriculum Perspectives usually cover Education (205 papers), Sociology and Political Science (128 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (66 papers) specifically the topics of Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (70 papers), Education Systems and Policy (65 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Curriculum Perspectives are Scott Willis, Tonia Gray, Hilary Whitehouse, Robert B. Stevenson, Kevin Lowe, Bill Green, P. R. Poulton, Kerry J. Kennedy, Tyson Yunkaporta and Bob Lingard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Curriculum Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Curriculum Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Curriculum Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Curriculum Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Curriculum Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Curriculum Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curriculum Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025