Middle East Critique

365 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 365 papers published in Middle East Critique in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Middle East Critique usually cover Sociology and Political Science (275 papers), Political Science and International Relations (208 papers) and Anthropology (27 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (124 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (94 papers) and Turkey's Politics and Society (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Middle East Critique are Koenraad Bogaert, Morten Valbjørn, Lewis Turner, Oliver Schlumberger, Erkan Saka, Christa Salamandra, Jillian Schwedler, Raymond Hinnebusch, Miriyam Aouragh and Bahar Başer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Middle East Critique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Middle East Critique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Middle East Critique.

Countries where authors publish in Middle East Critique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Middle East Critique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Middle East Critique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Middle East Critique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025