Journal of Media Practice

274 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 274 papers published in Journal of Media Practice in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Media Practice usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (88 papers), Sociology and Political Science (72 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (69 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (69 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (53 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Media Practice are Ali Ahmad, John H. Parmelee, Sarah Jones, Marcus Leaning, Yasmin Ibrahim, Henry Lowood, Desmond Bell, Susan Kerrigan, Patrick Ferrucci and Sonia Livingstone.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Media Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Media Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Media Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Media Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Media Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Media Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Media Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025