Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Biotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology.
About Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
The 1.3k papers published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 80.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology usually cover Biotechnology (207 papers), Molecular Biology (722 papers) and Pollution (95 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (215 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (181 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (155 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (110 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (84 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (60 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (59 papers) and Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology are Qayyum Husain, John Shi, Chundakkadu Krishna, Argyrios Margaritis, Rajinder K. Gupta, Wilson Parawira, Daniel Abramowicz, Yusuf Chisti, Surya Kant Mehta and J. P. Gaur.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.