Countries where authors publish in Natural Product Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Product Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Product Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Product Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Natural Product Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Product Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Product Reports.
About Natural Product Reports
The 2.2k papers published in Natural Product Reports in the last decades have received a total of 210.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Natural Product Reports usually cover Pharmacology (772 papers), Biotechnology (375 papers), Pharmacology (180 papers), Organic Chemistry (569 papers) and Toxicology (61 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (671 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (308 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (298 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (228 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (218 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (123 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (102 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Product Reports are Joseph P. Michael, D. John Faulkner, Zhong Jin, Brent R. Copp, David O’Hagan, James R. Hanson, Mark S. Butler, Braulio M. Fraga, Michèle R. Prinsep and Jeroen S. Dickschat.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.