Countries where authors publish in Biotechnology Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biotechnology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biotechnology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biotechnology Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Biotechnology Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biotechnology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biotechnology Reports.
About Biotechnology Reports
The 858 papers published in Biotechnology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 29.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Biotechnology Reports usually cover Biotechnology (162 papers), Molecular Biology (393 papers), Plant Science (202 papers), Pollution (60 papers) and Food Science (85 papers) specifically the topics of Biofuel production and bioconversion (93 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (80 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (77 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (74 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (58 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (47 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (43 papers) and Transgenic Plants and Applications (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biotechnology Reports are Naresh Kumar, Nidhi Goel, Vikas Pruthi, Batul Diwan, Pratima Gupta, P.R. Yaashikaa, A. Saravanan, Sunita Varjani, P. Senthil Kumar and S. Rajeshkumar.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.