International Review of Education
About
In The Last Decade
International Review of Education
1.5k papers receiving 14.0k citations
Fields of papers published in International Review of Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of Education.
Countries where authors publish in International Review of Education
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of Education more than expected).
- Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? (2012)
- On educational technology (1979)
- The development of ESD-related competencies in supportive institutional frameworks (2010)
- Understanding What We Do: Emerging Models for Human Rights Education (2002)
- Formal, nonformal and informal education: A holistic perspective on lifelong learning (1982)
- Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice (2019)
- Differences between the sexes in mathematics and science courses (1973)
- Decentralisation In Education, Institutional Culture And Teacher Autonomy In Indonesia (2004)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.