Comparative Education Review

2.3k papers and 28.0k indexed citations

About

The 2.3k papers published in Comparative Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 28.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Education Review usually cover Education (1.5k papers), Political Science and International Relations (925 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (775 papers) specifically the topics of Global Education and Multiculturalism (801 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (753 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (401 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Education Review are Emily Hannum, George Psacharopoulos, Keita Takayama, Carlos Alberto Torres, Susan L. Robertson, Stephen Carney, Karen Mundy, Robert F. Arnove, Gita Steiner‐Khamsi and Stephen P. Heyneman.

In The Last Decade

Comparative Education Review

1.8k papers receiving 20.8k citations

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Education Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Comparative Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Education Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026