Countries where authors publish in Comparative Education Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Education Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Comparative Education Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Education Review.
About Comparative Education Review
The 2.3k papers published in Comparative Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 28.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Comparative Education Review usually cover Education (1.5k papers), Political Science and International Relations (925 papers) and Demography (384 papers) specifically the topics of Global Education and Multiculturalism (801 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (753 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (401 papers), Religious Education and Schools (317 papers), Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (310 papers), School Choice and Performance (192 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (148 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Education Review are Emily Hannum, George Psacharopoulos, Keita Takayama, Carlos Alberto Torres, Susan L. Robertson, Karen Mundy, Stephen Carney, Robert F. Arnove, Stephen P. Heyneman and Gita Steiner‐Khamsi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.