This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archivaria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archivaria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archivaria more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Archivaria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archivaria.
About Archivaria
The 949 papers published in Archivaria in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Archivaria usually cover Space and Planetary Science (131 papers), Conservation (333 papers), Philosophy (182 papers), General Health Professions (185 papers) and History (61 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (329 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (173 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (173 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (173 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (131 papers), Canadian Identity and History (71 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (34 papers) and Photography and Visual Culture (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archivaria are Terry Cook, Luciana Duranti, Joan M. Schwartz, Heather MacNeil, Terry Eastwood, Barbara Lazenby Craig, Tom Nesmith, David Bearman, Terry Cook and Katie Shilton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.