Sleep Medicine Reviews

1.4k papers and 122.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Sleep Medicine Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 122.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Sleep Medicine Reviews usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (824 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (766 papers) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (585 papers) specifically the topics of Sleep and related disorders (777 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (745 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (379 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sleep Medicine Reviews are Maurice M. Ohayon, Avi Sadeh, Lena Lavie, Dieter Riemann, Jaime M. Monti, Chiara Cirelli, Alain Muzet, Luigi De Gennaro, Giulio Tononi and Michèle Ferrara.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sleep Medicine Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sleep Medicine Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sleep Medicine Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Sleep Medicine Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sleep Medicine Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sleep Medicine Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sleep Medicine Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025