IMF Economic Review

382 papers and 13.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 382 papers published in IMF Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations. Papers published in IMF Economic Review usually cover Finance (225 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (224 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (215 papers) specifically the topics of Global Financial Crisis and Policies (200 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (162 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IMF Economic Review are Luc Laeven, Fabián Valencia, Hyun Song Shin, Hélène Rey, Gian Maria Milesi‐Ferretti, Linda S. Goldberg, Philip R. Lane, Nicola Cetorelli, Seema Jayachandran and Anton Korinek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in IMF Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IMF Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IMF Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in IMF Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IMF Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IMF Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IMF Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025