Countries where authors publish in Acta Alimentaria
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Alimentaria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Alimentaria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Alimentaria more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Alimentaria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Alimentaria.
About Acta Alimentaria
The 1.4k papers published in Acta Alimentaria in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Acta Alimentaria usually cover Food Science (603 papers), Biochemistry (194 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (302 papers), Animal Science and Zoology (169 papers) and Biotechnology (139 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (174 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (153 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (119 papers), Food composition and properties (119 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (104 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (92 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (90 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Alimentaria are Andrea Lugasi, Mehmet Musa Özcan, Lájos Helyes, J. Vetter, J. Hóvári, Avrelija Čenčič, Zoltán Pék, Franci Štampar, Yrjö Mälkki and Miklós Mézes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.