Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism.

328 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 328 indexed citations. Written by Jessica R. Steinbrenner, Kara Hume, Samuel L. Odom, Kristi L. Morin, Sallie W. Nowell, Brianne Tomaszewski, Nancy S. McIntyre, Şerife Yücesoy Özkan and Melissa Savage covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (268 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (169 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w79661257 →

Countries where authors are citing Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w79661257.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026