Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations.
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005 →Countries where authors are citing Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations.
This map shows the geographic impact of Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations.
This network shows the impact of Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005.