Zvika Neeman
-
- Auction Theory and Applications 22
- Game Theory and Applications 17
- Safety Research top 2%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 23
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 18
- Economic theories and models 10
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 9
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 7
- Marketing top 5%
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing 6
Zvika Neeman
57 papers receiving 911 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Management Science and Operations Research 398
- Safety Research 225
- General Decision Sciences 36
- Economics and Econometrics 480
- Marketing 152
Countries citing papers authored by Zvika Neeman
This map shows the geographic impact of Zvika Neeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zvika Neeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zvika Neeman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zvika Neeman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zvika Neeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zvika Neeman. The network helps show where Zvika Neeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Zvika Neeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 5 | Government Financing of R&D: A Mechanism Design Approach | 2017 | 7 |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 12 | Does Private Selection Improve the Accuracy of Arbitrators' Decisions? | 2009 | 0 |
| 13 | Bling Bling, ∗ Human Capital, and Poverty † | 2008 | 3 |
| 14 | A Political Economy Model of Investor Protection | 2005 | 3 |
| 15 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 17 | The Freedom to Contract and the Free-Rider Problem | 1999 | 2 |
| 18 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 8 |
About Zvika Neeman
Zvika Neeman is a scholar working on Safety Research, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 986 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (23 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (22 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (18 papers), Game Theory and Applications (17 papers), Economic theories and models (10 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (9 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (398 citations), Safety Research (225 citations) and General Decision Sciences (36 citations). Zvika Neeman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Enriqueta Aragonés, Omer Moav, Aviad Heifetz, Deborah Minehart, Léonard Wantchekon, Tamar Kugler, Nir Vulkan, Yigal Attali, Analía Schlosser and Ady Pauzner. Their work appears in journals such as Econometrica, The Economic Journal and The Review of Economic Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.