The Review of Economic Studies

3.5k papers and 365.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in The Review of Economic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 365.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Review of Economic Studies usually cover Economics and Econometrics (2.6k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (852 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (603 papers) specifically the topics of Economic theories and models (1.2k papers), Economic Theory and Policy (415 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (411 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Review of Economic Studies are Stephen Bond, Manuel Arellano, Douglas W. Diamond, Kenneth J. Arrow, Charles F. Manski, James A. Mirrlees, Jean Tirole, A. R. Pagan, Trevor Breusch and Eric Maskin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Review of Economic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Review of Economic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Review of Economic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Review of Economic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Review of Economic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Review of Economic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Review of Economic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025