Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures
2001532 citationsSharan B. Merriam, Juanita Johnson‐Bailey et al.International Journal of Lifelong Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Youngwha Kee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Youngwha Kee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Youngwha Kee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Youngwha Kee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Youngwha Kee. The network helps show where Youngwha Kee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Youngwha Kee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Youngwha Kee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Youngwha Kee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Youngwha Kee. Youngwha Kee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kee, Youngwha. (2015). Retrospect and prospect of the academic credit bank system and its advancement of educational wellbeing in Korea. 8(1). 102.1 indexed citations
Kee, Youngwha, et al.. (2013). An Analysis of the Sungmisan Village Model as a Community Wellbeing Paradigm: Using Grounded Theory Method. Korean Public Administration Review. 47(1). 295–320.1 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Nam Sook, et al.. (2013). 사회적 일자리를 통한 은퇴 고령자 일경험의 의미: Modified Grounded Theory. 32(6). 133–156.
12.
Kee, Youngwha, et al.. (2013). Comparing Community Well-being Index Evaluations of Experts and Public Officials: Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method. Korean Public Administration Review. 47(2). 313–337.1 indexed citations
13.
Kee, Youngwha, et al.. (2012). An analysis of research trends of lifelong education in Korea from dissertation. 18(4). 65–85.
Kee, Youngwha, et al.. (2009). A study on the Lifelong Education Program Participation of older adults. 5(1). 55–74.
17.
Kee, Youngwha, et al.. (2009). A Study on the Participation of Older Adult Lifelong Education. 5(1). 75–102.1 indexed citations
18.
Kee, Youngwha, et al.. (2005). A comparison study on the effects of blended learning course and on-line course in a university class. 1(1). 63–80.2 indexed citations
19.
Merriam, Sharan B., et al.. (2005). Challenging the Hegemony of Western Views of Learning. New Prairie Press (Kansas State University).1 indexed citations
20.
Merriam, Sharan B., Gabo Ntseane, Ming‐Yeh Lee, et al.. (2000). Power and Positionality: Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status in Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research. New Prairie Press (Kansas State University).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.