Yeow Leng Chow
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Violeta LópezSok Ying LiawLing Ting WuPiyanee YobasShefaly ShoreyKhoon Kiat TanJeanette IgnacioYanika Kowitlawakul
- Topics
- Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of General Internal MedicineJournal of Clinical NursingInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Yeow Leng Chow
14 papers receiving 324 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- General Health Professions 128
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 90
- Clinical Psychology 77
- Research and Theory 77
- Physiology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Yeow Leng Chow
This map shows the geographic impact of Yeow Leng Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yeow Leng Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yeow Leng Chow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yeow Leng Chow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yeow Leng Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yeow Leng Chow. The network helps show where Yeow Leng Chow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yeow Leng Chow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yeow Leng Chow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yeow Leng Chow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yeow Leng Chow. Yeow Leng Chow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 12 |
About Yeow Leng Chow
Yeow Leng Chow is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (77 citations), Leadership and Management (31 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations). Yeow Leng Chow has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Violeta López, Sok Ying Liaw, Ling Ting Wu, Piyanee Yobas, Shefaly Shorey, Khoon Kiat Tan, Jeanette Ignacio, Yanika Kowitlawakul, Siriwan Lim and Eleanor Holroyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Clinical Nursing and International Journal of Medical Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.