Xin Tu

21.2k citations
334 papers · 13.5k indexed · 6 hit papers · h-index 61

Xin Tu

325 papers receiving 13.0k citations

Hit Papers

Post hoc power analysis: i...2372004202620112018200400600

Peers

Xin Tu
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 394
  • Clinical Psychology 3.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.0k
  • Health 1.2k
  • Statistics and Probability 1.0k
Replace Jos W. R. Twisk with:
Jos W. R. Twisk Netherlands
David B. Allison United States
John W Williams United States
Karina W. Davidson United States
M. Maria Glymour United States
Obioha C. Ukoumunne United Kingdom
Sue Duval United States
Robert D. Gibbons United States
Karin Groothuis‐Oudshoorn Netherlands
James C. Anthony United States
Xin Tu relative to Jos W. R. Twisk Netherlands Jos W. R. Twisk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jos W. R. Twisk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xin Tu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xin Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xin Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xin Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xin Tu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xin Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xin Tu. The network helps show where Xin Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xin Tu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xin Tu Line = papers co-authored together Xin Tu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20253
3 20252
4 20251
5 20241
6 20242
7 20232
8 20231
9 20225
10 202214
11 20224
12 20214
13 202022
14 20201
15 20206
16 202024
17 201914
18 201922
19 201126
20
A new catheter-related quality of life instrument for long-term urinary catheter users
20091

About Xin Tu

Xin Tu is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Health, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 334 papers that have together received 13.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (45 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (34 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (28 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (26 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (23 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (22 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (21 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (394 citations), Clinical Psychology (3.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.0k citations), Health (1.2k citations) and Statistics and Probability (1.0k citations). Xin Tu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Changyong Feng, Wan Tang, Yeates Conwell, Dilip V. Jeste, Naiji Lu, Ellen Lee, Jeanne Kowalski, Victor De Gruttola, Michael L. Perlis and Jeffrey M. Lyness. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics in Medicine, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, General Psychiatry, Journal of the American Statistical Association and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026