Nathan A. Gillespie
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicholas G. MartinAndrew C. HeathKenneth S. KendlerMichael C. NealeIan B. HickieSarah E. MedlandMargaret J. WrightDavid M. Evans
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (36 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (36 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNorway
In The Last Decade
Nathan A. Gillespie
134 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Clinical Psychology 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 872
- Psychiatry and Mental health 683
- Genetics 627
- Cognitive Neuroscience 560
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan A. Gillespie
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan A. Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan A. Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan A. Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan A. Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan A. Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan A. Gillespie. The network helps show where Nathan A. Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan A. Gillespie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan A. Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan A. Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan A. Gillespie. Nathan A. Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Nathan A. Gillespie
Nathan A. Gillespie is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 142 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (36 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (36 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (872 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (140 citations). Nathan A. Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas G. Martin, Andrew C. Heath, Kenneth S. Kendler, Michael C. Neale, Ian B. Hickie, Sarah E. Medland, Margaret J. Wright, David M. Evans, John B. Whitfield and Steven H. Aggen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.