Countries where authors publish in General Psychiatry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in General Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in General Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Psychiatry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in General Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in General Psychiatry.
About General Psychiatry
The 410 papers published in General Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations . Papers published in General Psychiatry usually cover Biological Psychiatry (39 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (123 papers), Clinical Psychology (127 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 papers) and Neurology (34 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (48 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (42 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (39 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (39 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (34 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (31 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (25 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in General Psychiatry are Swapnajeet Sahoo, Snehil Gupta, Xin Tu, Vikas Menon, Medha Sharath, Sujita Kumar Kar, Yiran Zhang, Sabrina M. Richardson, Rudolph P. Rull and Anna C. Rivera.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.