Michael L. Thomas

135 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Michael L. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 179
  • Applied Psychology 217
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 710
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 535
  • Clinical Psychology 710
Replace Nicholas R. Eaton with:
Nicholas R. Eaton United States
Frederick L. Coolidge United States
Philip A. Fisher United States
Margaret Drake United States
Tobias Kaufmann Norway
Xiangfei Meng China
Tobias Großmann Germany
Pascal Antoine France
Michael A. Hunter Canada
Stephen C. Newman Canada
Michael L. Thomas relative to Nicholas R. Eaton United States Nicholas R. Eaton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Nicholas R. Eaton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Thomas. The network helps show where Michael L. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 146 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010219
2 2004168
3 2016128
4 2021121
5 2015104
6 202099
7 199981
8 202168
9 199967
10 202164
11 201563
12 201761
13 201756
14 199954
15 201952
16 202051
17 202350
18 201149
19 199746
20 201845

About Michael L. Thomas

Michael L. Thomas is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 146 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (18 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (179 citations), Applied Psychology (217 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (710 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (535 citations) and Clinical Psychology (710 citations). Michael L. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Dilip V. Jeste, Gregory A. Light, Yash B. Joshi, Neal R. Swerdlow, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, J. Ricardo Arias‐Gonzalez, R. Carminati, Juan L. Molina, Barton W. Palmer and Joyce Sprock. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychological Assessment, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026