William S. Kremen
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Genetics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Ming T. TsuangMichael J. LyonsLarry J. SeidmanStephen V. FaraoneCarol E. FranzMatthew S. PanizzonRosemary ToomeyJohn Pepple
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (75 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (64 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (55 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandSweden
In The Last Decade
William S. Kremen
296 papers receiving 12.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
- Psychiatry and Mental health 5.5k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 4.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.9k
- Clinical Psychology 1.8k
- Genetics 1.7k
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Kremen
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Kremen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Kremen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Kremen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Kremen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Kremen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Kremen. The network helps show where William S. Kremen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Kremen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Kremen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Kremen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Kremen. William S. Kremen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 195 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 97 |
About William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 305 papers that have together received 12.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (75 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (64 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (55 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (5.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (699 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (4.9k citations). William S. Kremen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ming T. Tsuang, Michael J. Lyons, Larry J. Seidman, Stephen V. Faraone, Carol E. Franz, Matthew S. Panizzon, Rosemary Toomey, John Pepple, Kristen C. Jacobson and Hong Xian. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.