Gaia Barazzetti

17 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Gaia Barazzetti
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 190
  • General Health Professions 158
  • Clinical Psychology 45
  • Sociology and Political Science 33
  • Information Systems and Management 25
Replace Alvita K. Nathaniel with:
Alvita K. Nathaniel United States
F.J.H. Vosman Netherlands
Alisa L. Carse United States
Gizell Green Israel
Maria de Lourdes Custódio Duarte Brazil
Diego Gracia Spain
Julie Browne United Kingdom
Hans-Martin Saß Germany
Maria Odete Pereira Brazil
Helen Kohlen Germany
Gaia Barazzetti relative to Alvita K. Nathaniel United States Alvita K. Nathaniel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alvita K. Nathaniel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gaia Barazzetti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gaia Barazzetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gaia Barazzetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gaia Barazzetti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gaia Barazzetti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gaia Barazzetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gaia Barazzetti. The network helps show where Gaia Barazzetti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gaia Barazzetti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gaia Barazzetti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gaia Barazzetti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gaia Barazzetti. Gaia Barazzetti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 5
4
[Electronic health record: strongbox, PDF bin, or collective public health project ?]
1
5 12
6 13
7 20
8
Biobanking on participation: exploring the co-production of bioprovision and biosociality in Swiss biobanking
1
9 11
10 6
11 3
12 1
13 5
14 55
15 2
16 77
17 39
18 20
19 1

About Gaia Barazzetti

Gaia Barazzetti is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Aging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (190 citations), General Health Professions (158 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Gaia Barazzetti has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roberta Sala, Claudia Borreani, Guido Miccinesi, Franco Toscani, Helena Leino‐Kilpi, Chryssoula Lemonidou, Konstantinos Petsios, Brenda Spencer, Win Tadd and Camilla Strandell‐Laine. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and European Journal of Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026