Hazel Heath

63 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Hazel Heath
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Research and Theory 12
  • General Health Professions 276
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 42
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 93
Replace Philip Clissett with:
Philip Clissett United Kingdom
Sienna Caspar Canada
Juliana C. Cartwright United States
Anita S. Tesh United States
Andrew Harding United Kingdom
Ken Hok Man Ho Hong Kong
Kate-Ellen Elliott Australia
Annetta Smith United Kingdom
Qarin Lood Sweden
Masayo Kashiwagi Japan
Hazel Heath relative to Philip Clissett United Kingdom Philip Clissett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philip Clissett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Heath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Heath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Heath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Heath. The network helps show where Hazel Heath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Heath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hazel Heath Line = papers co-authored together Hazel Heath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201252
2 201549
3
My Home Life: Quality of Life in Care Homes
200647
4 201132
5 198830
6 200123
7 201020
8 201116
9 200914
10 201912
11 201212
12 200511
13 200611
14 20119
15
Older people and nursing : issues of living in a care home
19968
16 20097
17 20026
18 20095
19 20115
20 20095

About Hazel Heath

Hazel Heath is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Demography, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (10 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), General Health Professions (276 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (42 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (93 citations). Hazel Heath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jill Manthorpe, Julienne Meyer, Kritika Samsi, Isabel White, Barbara J. Bowers, Christine Mueller, Katherine S. McGilton, Véronique Boscart, Charlene H. Chu and Anne‐Marie Boström. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Older People Nursing, The Journal of Adult Protection, Nursing Standard, Quality in Ageing and Older Adults and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact