William Wei

831 citations
49 papers · 547 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

William Wei

46 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

William Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Development 53
  • Strategy and Management 169
  • Business and International Management 19
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 68
  • Communication 33
Replace Diana Benito‐Osorio with:
Diana Benito‐Osorio Spain
Susan Ariel Aaronson United States
Jayoti Das United States
Jadranka Švarc Croatia
Jesús C. Peña‐Vinces Spain
Josh Whitford United States
Raphaël K. Akamavi United Kingdom
Tirta Nugraha Mursitama Indonesia
Ernest Miguélez Spain
Robyn Klingler‐Vidra United Kingdom
William Wei relative to Diana Benito‐Osorio Spain Diana Benito‐Osorio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Diana Benito‐Osorio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Wei. The network helps show where William Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Wei Line = papers co-authored together William Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199597
2 201331
3 201829
4 202026
5 202022
6 202021
7
EnCase Computer Forensics -- The Official EnCE: EnCase Certified Examiner Study Guide
200620
8 201020
9 201619
10 201618
11 201716
12 201616
13
Counterrevolution in China: The Nationalists in Jiangxi during the Soviet Period
198516
14 202114
15 202014
16 201413
17 201812
18 199211
19 201910
20 20129

About William Wei

William Wei is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Development and Cultural Studies, having authored 49 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (11 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), International Development and Aid (6 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (4 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (53 citations), Strategy and Management (169 citations), Business and International Management (19 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (68 citations) and Communication (33 citations). William Wei has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Etayankara Muralidharan, Albena Pergelova, Fernando Angulo‐Ruiz, Dezhi Chen, Juan Zhang, Ilan Alon, Hien Thu Tran, Enrico Santarelli, Bernadette Andréosso-O’Callaghan and S. Thomson. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Thunderbird International Business Review, International Migration Review, Journal of African Business and Modern China.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact