William Vine

34 papers receiving 935 citations

Peers

William Vine
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 105
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 207
  • Transplantation 33
  • Physiology 221
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 141
Replace Deborah Panebianco with:
Deborah Panebianco United States
Takeshi Yoshioka Japan
Alan Kosaka United States
R Stoltz United States
JA Wagner United States
Takao Yamamoto Japan
Youssef Hijazi Germany
Norbert Kolassa Germany
Smiljana Ristič Croatia
Marga Nijenhuis Netherlands
William Vine relative to Deborah Panebianco United States Deborah Panebianco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Deborah Panebianco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Vine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Vine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Vine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Vine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Vine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Vine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Vine. The network helps show where William Vine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Vine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Vine Line = papers co-authored together William Vine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995147
2 1996109
3 1987104
4 198373
5 197067
6 198558
7 198750
8 199541
9 199137
10 199136
11 197232
12 197330
13 198124
14 197923
15 199118
16 199318
17 199417
18 197317
19 199515
20 199615

About William Vine

William Vine is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Epidemiology and Physiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (105 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (207 citations), Transplantation (33 citations), Physiology (221 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (141 citations). William Vine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include T J Rink, Bronislava Gedulin, Andrew A. Young, Garland R. Marshall, Anthony Cerami, Philip Needleman, P H Pekala, Masanobu Kawakami, Alejandro Zentella‐Dehesa and Larry D. Bowers. Their work appears in journals such as Hormone and Metabolic Research, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemical Society Transactions and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact