Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Challenges, Deployment, and Practice
Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Smith. The network helps show where Peter J. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter J. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter J. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter J. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter J. Smith. Peter J. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Liao, Bin, Hien Quoc Ngo, Michail Matthaiou, & Peter J. Smith. (2024). Power Allocation for Massive MIMO-ISAC Systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. 23(10). 14232–14248.17 indexed citations
Smith, Peter J. & Elizabeth Smythe. (2009). OPEN SPACES, OPEN SOURCES. Information Communication & Society. 12(6). 793–816.3 indexed citations
8.
Heide, C.M. van der, Floor Brouwer, Stéphane Bellon, et al.. (2007). Review of approaches to establish reference levels to interpret indicators. Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos.1 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Peter J.. (2006). OCR Advanced Economics. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Peter J., et al.. (2005). Getting to Grips with Learning Styles.. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.25 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Peter J.. (2004). Sources of Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of the Court's Quest for Original Meaning. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Smith, Peter J., et al.. (2002). Implementing training packages in a TAFE institute: perceptions and concerns of staff. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 10(1). 1–22.3 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Peter J., et al.. (1999). The effect of the addition of gold on secondary phase formation in RE-Ba-Cu-O (RE=Y, Nd). Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.
15.
Smith, Peter J.. (1993). LUC public key encryption: a secure alternative to RSA. 18(1). 44–49.12 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Peter J. & Mick Lennon. (1993). LUC: A New Public Key System. 103–117.61 indexed citations
Smith, Peter J. & Robby Schönfeld. (1971). STUDIES OF STUDDED-TIRE DAMAGE AND PERFORMANCE IN ONTARIO DURING THE WINTER OF 1969-1970. Highway Research Record.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.