William R. Harper
- General Health Professions top 0.2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- F. Stanford MassieAnne EackerTait D. ShanafeltMatthew R. ThomasDavid V. PowerLiselotte N. DyrbyeSteven J. DurningJeff A. Sloan
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (13 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (10 papers)Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers)
- Cited by
- General Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthFamily Practice
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
William R. Harper
39 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
- General Health Professions 3.1k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.1k
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Social Psychology 573
- Gender Studies 518
Countries citing papers authored by William R. Harper
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Harper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Harper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Harper. The network helps show where William R. Harper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Harper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Harper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Harper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Harper. William R. Harper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92 | |
| 2 | 126 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 192 | |
| 6 | A NEW MUSCULO-SKELETAL CURRICULUM – HAS IT MADE A DIFFERENCE? | 6 |
| 7 | Relationship Between Burnout and Professional Conduct and Attitudes Among US Medical Studentsbreakdown → | 674 |
| 8 | 292 | |
| 9 | 357 | |
| 10 | 334 | |
| 11 | 271 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 371 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 142 |
About William R. Harper
William R. Harper is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (13 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (10 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (3.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.1k citations) and Family Practice (139 citations). William R. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include F. Stanford Massie, Anne Eacker, Tait D. Shanafelt, Matthew R. Thomas, David V. Power, Liselotte N. Dyrbye, Steven J. Durning, Jeff A. Sloan, Christine Moutier and Daniel Szydlo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, JAMA and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.