William M. Schniedewind
- Religious studies top 0.5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 23
- Archeology top 2%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 20
- Ancient Near East History 7
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 3
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 1
- Development top 10%
- History top 10%
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 11
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 1
-
- Islamic Studies and History 1
- Co-authors
- Gary A. RendsburgSteven L. McKenzieMichael GoulderAlan DundesSusan NiditchDavid M. CarrGary N. Knoppers
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (4 papers)Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (3 papers)Vetus Testamentum (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
William M. Schniedewind
23 papers receiving 140 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Religious studies 160
- Archeology 149
- Space and Planetary Science 5
- Development 14
- History 20
Countries citing papers authored by William M. Schniedewind
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Schniedewind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Schniedewind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Schniedewind more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Schniedewind
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Schniedewind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Schniedewind. The network helps show where William M. Schniedewind may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside William M. Schniedewind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 6 | Linguistic Dating, Writing Systems, and the Pentateuchal Sources | 2016 | 0 |
| 7 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 9 | The Siloam Tunnel Inscription: Historical and Linguistic Perspectives | 2010 | 6 |
| 10 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 0 |
About William M. Schniedewind
William M. Schniedewind is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Development, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 30 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (23 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (20 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers), Ancient Near East History (7 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper) and Islamic Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (160 citations), Archeology (149 citations), Space and Planetary Science (5 citations), Development (14 citations) and History (20 citations). William M. Schniedewind has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Gary A. Rendsburg, Steven L. McKenzie, Michael Goulder, Alan Dundes, Susan Niditch, David M. Carr and Gary N. Knoppers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, Vetus Testamentum, Religion Compass and Harvard Theological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.