Vetus Testamentum

3.3k papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in Vetus Testamentum in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Vetus Testamentum usually cover Religious studies (2.3k papers), Archeology (1.6k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2.2k papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (1.3k papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (895 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vetus Testamentum are J. A. Emerton, H. G. M. Williamson, Robert P. Gordon, Graham Davies, Brevard S. Childs, Israel Finkelstein, H. J. Franken, Nadav Na’aman, Walther Zimmerli and Stefan C. Reif.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Vetus Testamentum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vetus Testamentum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vetus Testamentum.

Countries where authors publish in Vetus Testamentum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vetus Testamentum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vetus Testamentum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vetus Testamentum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025