Harvard Theological Review

1.4k papers and 4.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Harvard Theological Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Harvard Theological Review usually cover Religious studies (680 papers), Archeology (530 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (521 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (619 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (350 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (341 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Harvard Theological Review are Walter N. Pahnke, Krister Stendahl, Arthur Kleinman, Helmut Koester, Shaye J. D. Cohen, Elaine H. Pagels, Frank Moore Cross, Morton Smith, Adela Yarbro Collins and Eldon Jay Epp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Harvard Theological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Harvard Theological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Harvard Theological Review.

Countries where authors publish in Harvard Theological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Harvard Theological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Harvard Theological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard Theological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025