William M. O’Barr
- Law top 0.1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 1%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Co-authors
- John M. ConleySusan S. SilbeyE. Allan LindLaurence GoldmanRichard OhmannCheris KramaraeMark TesslerEdward Timke
- Topics
- Law in Society and Culture (13 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (12 papers)Legal Education and Practice Innovations (8 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyContemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews
- Partner nations
- United StatesLithuaniaArgentina
In The Last Decade
William M. O’Barr
65 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Law 470
- Sociology and Political Science 462
- Language and Linguistics 454
- Gender Studies 253
- Literature and Literary Theory 245
Countries citing papers authored by William M. O’Barr
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. O’Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. O’Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. O’Barr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. O’Barr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. O’Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. O’Barr. The network helps show where William M. O’Barr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. O’Barr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. O’Barr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. O’Barr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. O’Barr. William M. O’Barr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law | 15 |
| 17 | The Culture of Capital: An Anthropological Investigation of Institutional Investment | 5 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | Fundamentals of Jurisprudence: An Ethnography of Judicial Decision Making in Informal Courts | 18 |
| 20 | 14 |
About William M. O’Barr
William M. O’Barr is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Law and Museology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (13 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (12 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (470 citations), Language and Linguistics (454 citations) and Linguistics and Language (152 citations). William M. O’Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lithuania and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include John M. Conley, Susan S. Silbey, E. Allan Lind, Laurence Goldman, Richard Ohmann, Cheris Kramarae, Mark Tessler, Edward Timke, James G. Carrier and Michael S. Kimmel. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.