Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse.

278 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1991, received 278 indexed citations. Written by Susan S. Silbey, John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr covering the research area of Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Law (116 citations), Sociology and Political Science (112 citations) and Language and Linguistics (60 citations). Published in Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2073729 →

Countries where authors are citing Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2073729.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026